by peblin » Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:08 am
Thanks Ernie.
I definitely agree that it's flexible. I hadn't thought about putting the combination decks *inside* the folder. That helps reducing what I described as clutter, i.e. having both a Folder and a Combination deck next to each other with similar names on the "root" page.
I'll try to clarify what I mean from a user story perspective: "As a user, I want to be able to practice a whole folder so that I can use my folder structure much in the same way I would use a combination deck".
What I'd like to do could be solved by for example having an automatic combination deck of all folder contents added to all folder views. So, in my France folder, I'd have "Bordeaux", "Champagne", and "All decks in folder" decks to practice.
Or, perhaps a button saying "Practice folder" when I'm in a folder.
In a coding sense - if a Deck is an IDeck, and a Combination Deck is a deck-of-decks IDeck, well then - why cant a folder be a deck-of-decks IDeck as well?
Hope this clarifies my thinking a bit...
Thanks Ernie.
I definitely agree that it's flexible. I hadn't thought about putting the combination decks *inside* the folder. That helps reducing what I described as clutter, i.e. having both a Folder and a Combination deck next to each other with similar names on the "root" page.
I'll try to clarify what I mean from a user story perspective: "As a user, I want to be able to practice a whole folder so that I can use my folder structure much in the same way I would use a combination deck".
What I'd like to do could be solved by for example having an automatic combination deck of all folder contents added to all folder views. So, in my France folder, I'd have "Bordeaux", "Champagne", and "All decks in folder" decks to practice.
Or, perhaps a button saying "Practice folder" when I'm in a folder.
In a coding sense - if a Deck is an IDeck, and a Combination Deck is a deck-of-decks IDeck, well then - why cant a folder be a deck-of-decks IDeck as well?
Hope this clarifies my thinking a bit...